- Who We Are
- Where We Stand
- Our Rights
- Our Benefits
- Our Chapters
- ADAPT Community Network
- Administrative Education Officers and Analysts
- Adult Education
- Block Institute
- Education Officers & Education Analysts
- Family Child Care Providers
- Federation of Nurses
- Hearing Education Services
- Hearing Officers (per Session)
- Occupational / Physical Therapists
- Retired Teachers
- School Counselors
- School Nurses
- School Secretaries
- Social Workers & Psychologists
- Speech Improvement
- Supervisors of Nurses & Therapists
- Teachers Assigned
- Charter School Chapters
- Other DOE Chapters
- Other Non-DOE Chapters
- Get Involved
- Career Timeline
- CTLE / LearnUFT
- Classroom Resources
- Courses / Workshops
- English Language Learners
- Job Opportunities
- Positive Learning Collaborative
- Professional Development Resources
- Students with Disabilities
- Teacher Center
- Teacher Leadership
- Teacher's Choice
- Team High School
UFT.org Home > News > Op-eds & Letters to the Editor > Testing obsession must end this year: Low scores were a hard lesson for Mayor Bloomberg
by Michael Mulgrew | published September 1, 2010
[This op-ed was originally published in the Daily News.]
The instructional strategy of the New York City public school system — prepping children for a now-discredited series of state tests — has failed. Particularly now that the state has won nearly $700 million in new federal funds in the Race to the Top competition, we need to be honest about that failure, so we can finally focus on strategies that will make a difference for our kids.
This summer, the state Education Department, responding to widespread suspicion that state test standards were too low and that the test had become too predictable, redefined "proficiency." The result was a dramatic plunge in scores. Under the new scoring regimen, fewer than half the city's third- through eighth-graders are considered proficient in reading and just over half in mathematics, down from last year's numbers of two-thirds proficient in reading and 82% proficient in math.
This should not have been a surprise. While the city's eighth-grade reading scores on the state test were soaring, the National Assessment of Educational Progress, the gold standard for such tests, showed that eighth-grade reading scores for New York City fell from 2003 to 2007 and have only now recovered to their 2003 level. Meanwhile, out of approximately 500 "scale score" National Assessment points, New York City's fourth-grade math scores have gone up 11 points, and two other categories, 7 points each. Many other big cities have done at least as well overall, and some — particularly Atlanta, L.A. and Boston — have done substantially better.
New York has to take some important lessons from this debacle.
First: Test prep isn't instruction. In virtually every school I have gone into in recent years, teachers complained about instructional time lost to prepping students for tests. Art and music fell by the wayside years ago in most schools, but many schools were also shortchanging key subjects like history and science — because reading and math tests were the only ones that counted.
New state tests are going to be designed to be less vulnerable to this kind of "gaming." To the extent possible, test prep should be strictly limited.
Second: The racial achievement gap still looms large. Boasts by the administration that its strategies were closing the proficiency gap between white/Asian students and black/Hispanic youngsters turned out to be baseless. Under the new scoring regimen, the math proficiency gap between white and black students doubled overnight, to 34 points from 17.
Meanwhile, the administration's insistence on a standardized test for entrance into gifted programs has meant that the percentage of minority children in such enriched programs has declined.
Third: Thousands of youngsters now in high school are in real danger of not graduating. The promotion gate established by the Education Department for eighth-graders was so wide that almost everyone got through it. Only students in the lowest achievement category — Level 1 — were denied promotion, and because of the score inflation on the state tests, only about 3% of eighth-graders fell into this category. The result was that thousands of children got into high school who were unprepared for high school work.
Fourth: Live by the scores, die by the scores. Mayor Bloomberg once said, "In God we trust. Everyone else, bring data." The school system vastly expanded its testing and monitoring operations and pressured principals and teachers to focus all attention on state tests that produced reams of data. Because the tests were so flawed, most of it is now useless.
The United Federation of Teachers worked with the state on its Race to the Top application because we believe that a rich curriculum for every student — not test prep — is the only way to bring real progress to our schools. Now that we have won these new funds, the state must deliver on that promise. It must develop, based on that curriculum, a more reliable assessment of the success of both students and teachers than any standardized test.
What is your favorite movie about a teacher?
Dead Poets Society
Stand and Deliver
Mr. Holland's Opus
Total votes: 509