Skip to main content
Full Menu Close Menu

Draft IEPs

It is the practice in many schools to prepare a draft of the IEP or sections of the IEP before the IEP team meeting.  There is no discussion of draft IEPs in state or local New York City publications regarding IEP development, including the New York City Special Education Standard Operating Procedures Manual.  For this reason, we present in full the commentary to the federal IDEA Regulations on this topic:

"With respect to a draft IEP, we encourage public agency staff to come to an IEP Team meeting prepared to discuss evaluation findings and preliminary recommendations. Likewise, parents have the right to bring questions, concerns, and preliminary recommendations to the IEP Team meeting as part of a full discussion of the child’s needs and the services to be provided to meet those needs. We do not encourage public agencies to prepare a draft IEP prior to the IEP Team meeting, particularly if doing so would inhibit a full discussion of the child’s needs. However, if a public agency develops a draft IEP prior to the IEP Team meeting, the agency should make it clear to the parents at the outset of the meeting that the services proposed by the agency are preliminary recommendations for review and discussion with the parents. The public agency also should provide the parents with a copy of its draft proposals, if the agency has developed them, prior to the IEP Team meeting so as to give the parents an opportunity to review the recommendations of the public agency prior to the IEP Team meeting, and be better able to engage in a full discussion of the proposals for the IEP. It is not permissible for an agency to have the final IEP completed before an IEP Team meeting begins.” [Emphasis added] FR 46678

Expanding on the last point, presenting parents with a finalized IEP at or before the IEP Team meeting is considered predetermination and violates IDEA.  Predetermination refers to situations where school personnel make decisions about the content of the IEP without engaging in meaningful discussion and involving parents in the process. “Cookie-cutter” IEPs (ICT services are limited to specific subjects or number of periods; all students receive related services three times a week in a group of three), refusal to consider other service or placement options, and pressing the parent to accept the IEP as written are all examples of predetermination.  Predetermination claims often appear in due process complaints filed by parents seeking impartial hearings.